SOLVED Wildcard Formatting

[atsak]

Routing inbound calls using CID.

Current is _1XXXXXXXXXX
Need to account for CID where the 1 is not provided by the caller (get both kinds)

What's the right format for that?

 

[kenn10]

Just create another route with _XXXXXXXXXX (you're just deleting the "1" from the original route.)

 

[atsak]

Just create another route with _XXXXXXXXXX (you're just deleting the "1" from the original route.)

Mmm there are 300 routes . . . that then means there's 600 routes on my inbound route list. I was hoping for a single route for each area code.

 

[billsimon]

Normalize your caller IDs before they get to the matching.

You can use the provided [from-pstn-e164-us] context as an example.

Then you will only need one set of either 10-digit or 11-digit matching rules, depending on how you decide to normalize (10-digit would be typical).

 

[atsak]

Ooo yes good idea - everything is from-trunk but I could change it to the e164-us context. Thanks.

 

[billsimon]

Ooo yes good idea - everything is from-trunk but I could change it to the e164-us context. Thanks.

The e164 context only manipulates numbers that start with +. You will have to copy that idea and make your own to handle caller IDs that start with 1. It should be quite simple. Put it in the extensions_custom.conf file and point your trunk(s) at it.

 

[atsak]

Oh, um, I just tested this sending a 1NXXXXXXXXX CID and it stripped it. I'm tired today so I can't figure out how that happened.

Here's the outbound leg log lines from the softphone:
-- Executing [s@macro-dialout-trunk:19] ExecIf("SIP/5554-001056c0", "1?Set(CONNECTEDLINE(num,i)=1855mynumber") in new stack
-- Executing [s@macro-dialout-trunk:20] ExecIf("SIP/5554-001056c0", "1?Set(CONNECTEDLINE(name,i)=CID:19474444444)

Here's the inbound leg.

Executing [1855mynumber@from-pstn-e164-us:1] Set("SIP/VI174.30-001056c2", "CALLERID(number)=9474444444") in new stack
-- Executing [1855mynumber@from-pstn-e164-us:2] Goto("SIP/VI174.30-001056c2", "from-pstn,1855mynumber,1") in new stack


Here's the context:


[from-pstn-e164-us]
exten => _+1NXXNXXXXXX/_+1NXXNXXXXXX,1,Set(CALLERID(number)=${CALLERID(number):2})
exten => _+1NXXNXXXXXX/_NXXNXXXXXX,2,Goto(from-pstn,${EXTEN:2},1)
exten => _+1NXXNXXXXXX/_+NX.,1,Set(CALLERID(number)=011${CALLERID(number):1})
exten => _+1NXXNXXXXXX/_011NX.,n,Goto(from-pstn,${EXTEN:2},1)
exten => _+1NXXNXXXXXX,1,Goto(from-pstn,${EXTEN:2},1)
exten => _[0-9+]./_+1NXXNXXXXXX,1,Set(CALLERID(number)=${CALLERID(number):2})
exten => _[0-9+]./_1NXXNXXXXXX,1,Set(CALLERID(number)=${CALLERID(number):1})
exten => _[0-9+]./_NXXNXXXXXX,n,Goto(from-pstn,${EXTEN},1)
exten => _[0-9+]./_+NX.,1,Set(CALLERID(number)=011${CALLERID(number):1})
exten => _[0-9+]./_011NX.,n,Goto(from-pstn,${EXTEN},1)
exten => _[0-9+].,1,Goto(from-pstn,${EXTEN},1)
exten => s/_+1NXXNXXXXXX,1,Set(CALLERID(number)=${CALLERID(number):2})
exten => s/_NXXNXXXXXX,n,Goto(from-pstn,${EXTEN},1)

 

[jerrm]

I think @billsimon is mistaken. I use from-pstn-e164-us to strip the 1 (without the +).

 

[billsimon]

I think @billsimon is mistaken. I use from-pstn-e164-us to strip the 1 (without the +).

Yes, of course both of you are right and I was mistaken. You should be all set!