Search results

I agree with most of what you wrote, except this: Even in its latest pre-release v2.1-RC snapshots, pfSense (based on FreeBSD 8.3) doesn't offer a very good support for WiFi, so one would be advised to use an external AP.

Apparently this is the case used:

Great! I wonder if it would be possible to use these stats to try to estimate the number of PIAF live installs ... e.g. by counting 1) the number of unique public IPs (with appropriate user-agent) that retrieved rssfeed.xml 2) the number of unique public IPs (with appropriate user-agent)...

It's a known issue, check http://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/1629 Try pfSense 2.1, it is much improved in many regards, including this issue.

Have you tried a simple "sip reload" from Asterisk's CLI ? I have seen this issue before. Which router are you using ?

Indeed, it won't be easy to restore a dd image into a smaller block device (btw it seems that CF cards of the same nominal size e.g. 4GB are getting smaller every year). I haven't used the RasPi, but here are some general suggestions: First of you should use fdisk -l /dev/sdx to get the...

It potentially affects any secure (SSL/TLS) webserver. You can simply run the aforementioned java sw to check for yourself. Btw the default configuration of Debian 6.x (squeeze) is also "vulnerable". As I asked above, I'd be most interested to know how the OP concluded that his Asterisk PBX's...

Thanks for the feedback. Have you actually found evidence that it was indeed a BEAST attack, or did you conclude that with deductive reasoning ("reductio ad absurdum", "εις άτοπον απαγωγή") after having excluded everything else ?

Indeed, this was how pfSense 1.2.3 (EoL) worked by default. And until 3-4 years ago this setting was often necessary in order to connect to some carriers. However most (all?) reasonably modern SIP stacks support NAT traversal technology which makes it unnecessary to do static-port NAT. Hence...

pfSense in its default configuration utilizes "symmetric NAT" which is the most restrictive (and secure) type of NAT Note: You can read more about NAT types at http://www.cisco.com/web/about/ac123/ac147/archived_issues/ipj_7-3/anatomy.html...